Why are these two games even being compared? Granted, they're both first person shooters, but that's where the similarities end. PlanetSide and HL2 are so wildly different, comparing them is like comparing apples and jelly fish.
PlanetSide is an amazing game, but I think it was just before its time. It doesn't appeal to most gamers, because it isn't mindless non-stop frag action.
To be honest, I was extremely dissapointed with the HL2 single player. I never really felt like I was having fun, as everything I was doing seemed like a chore which put me on the path to completing another chore. The game had you travel to one area, talk to someone, have them send you somewhere else, to have someone else send me to somewhere else. The characters were annoying, and I wouldn't cared if they were all wiped out in the first few moments of the game. Alot of it just didn't make sense either. At the end of HL, you went in to a sleep (sorta). Years later, when HL2 starts, you're awakened.. but somehow everyone already knew you were coming? The story was so underexplained it was ridiculous, regardless of whether Valve was trying to keep the whole background mysterious. No excuse for that.
I dunno, HL2 was probably one of the most overhyped games ever. The mod community is promising though. But yea, PlanetSide and HL2 back-to-back comparisons don't make sense, so don't do it.
|