Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gto
it is not really a democratic way of doing things
|
... and this isn't a true democracy. If we have 1000 users, then 99% of the community are not involved in 99% of the decisions we make. Thankfully, we don't use polls to make important decisions like the league rules - we simply don't have time to fully explain all the options, and their consequences, to 1000 people. This is not a community mod. The community has an extremely large voice through both the forums and the IRC channel, but at the end of the day, we are the ones who make the decisions - and take responsibility for them. If you don't like our decisions, vote with your player minutes (I think you might find that this is similar to the way governments work - your government does not take a poll on every decision it wants to make, it takes them for you, and if you don't like it, you don't vote for them).
With the 20+ people in the IRC channel, we may not have had every forum member particpating in the discussions, but we had a damn good representation of the target demographic: keen SourceForts players looking for competitive play. The purpose of the discussion was not to get each and every player's personal input and ideas, but to see how a group of players as a whole would react to the proposals. The opinion polls you read in the papers every day haven't been taken by every single citizen of your country, they've been taken by a small, generally randomised, group. This is no different. We had a good cross-section of gaming skill levels, technical competence and competitive experience in that channel this evening - the only common factor was that everybody wanted a league to go ahead.
IRC is an extremely accessible technology, but, if anything (and don't bother calling me up on this statement because it should be common knowledge that I say things like this already) it allows us to filter out the large group of forum users who have a lot of ideas, none of which have been properly thought through (or, in a lot of cases, properly typed), and concentrate on the ideas of the few who could take the time to install a piece of software, and set aside the time (which was about the most convenient cross-timezone time possible) to come and talk to us. We made more progress in two hours than three weeks of forum topics could have accomplished. If you were really concerned about the rules, then you should have done one of two things:
1) Turned up for the meeting (you've posted since the meeting, so no early bedtime for you)
2) Instead of making a post complaining about the use of an extremely common technology in our design process, made a post detailing your concerns about the league rules (you haven't actually voiced any) and your suggestions for resolving them.
At the end of the day, the rules will evolve into their best possible form. I very much doubt that you could have contributed anything unique to this evenings' meeting. Hell, I missed 95% of it, and I only had one minor disagreement with the final document which was quickly resolved.
If you had any good ideas, chances are they were suggested. If you had any objections, chances are they were raised.